Originally posted by Nikkie
View Post
original
This is not directed at you only Nikkie but all members [and lurkers; about time you joined in!!]. I have often said no matter how good our screen calibration tools are or how well our screen is calibrated we still need to be able to READ the image. I feel this is a good example of not reading the image before posting. Again, I'm not picking on Nikkie here as she is very new to the serious side of photography>>Nikkie saw what she wanted to see in the image on her screen; she does not have the experience to see or READ the darkness or the off-angle of her the photo she posted. We all need to READ the photo. (I think I first heard the expression of READING when we were having a lab installed and we were been taught how to read the negative in the days before monitors were fitted to mini labs)
Often our emotions also get in the way with photos of our kids/family/pets and we will not see past the emotions to read the photo as a photo. And this is often carried into comments about such photos. Words like "she/he is soooo cute/what beautiful eyes/ what a smile..." are often posted when the the actual photo was actually very poor quality. Jacko pointed out a recent thread to me where everyone was so wrapped up in the cuteness of the subject that most forgot to READ the photos as a photos and as "professional" photos they were rather poor!! This is a photography forum folks.
and BTW: yes, i know this is the snap shot forum but .........
Comment