Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Includes seascape, panorama and travel photography
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
Looks like a hard life . Enjoy before it gets a bit chilly.
Processing on #3 gives it a bit more life - but also looks slightly over cooked in the shadows - I like the sky - maybe somewhere between?
I'd also consider cropping a bit off the bottom?( and in #1 also plus some off the top too for a more pano feel)
CheersLast edited by Alan; 29-03-2016, 09:19 PM.
Comment
-
Comment
-
I think the first one was better the way it was?
I prefer the crop on the second one.
Hope you don't mind, but I had a play to try to coax out some more detail.
Too many adjustments to list, but Shadows and Highlights, curves, reduce saturation in the blues, cyans and reds, dodge and burn. Slight 'Soft Light' Layer, slight Gaussian Blur around the edges.
Might be too much
Looks like a nice spot - I didn't notice the dog before
Comment
-
Thanks Alan. It looks good but seems to have lost some authenticity if you know what I mean.
Would still like to know exactly what you did if you don't mind.
-
I do know what you mean - but also consider that the human eye compensates for varying/contrasting light levels and I suspect your first photo may not represent exactly the light levels you remember? I was just trying to address the unbalance in what the camera captured as to what it looked like at the time.
I can't remember all the micro adjustments, but the major ones were what I described. I did duplicate the layer and selected only the foreground and mid ground to work on, as I thought the sky was fine. After various adjustments to saturation, shadows, brightness, contrast and dodge and burn , I then gradually erased parts of the top layer on the boundary with the sky to soften the transition.
Users of Light room would have found it easier with adjustment brushes I'm sure.
Cheers
-
Thanks for that Alan. I have Lightroom 5 but am fairly new to adjustment brushes. Might have a play later.
I've also just noticed that the image appears darker on the internet browser than in Lightroom or in photo viewer. Is that common/normal?Last edited by Toddyh; 30-03-2016, 02:32 PM.
-
-
Comment
-
Better - still looks way too saturated and blue (and dark in the FG) on my monitor. The sky is nice, but I think the people are also important elements in this photo, and as such, need to stand out more imho
Would be good to get some other feedback/comments/suggestions.
Thanks for having a go
ps not sure why it appears darker on your/my Browser sorry. I've heard that others have had that problem too. Have you tried linking from another site eg FlickrLast edited by Alan; 30-03-2016, 03:31 PM.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Reds still look overdone - but otherwise looks much better on my monitor. Did you try a bit of subtle dodging of mid-tones on things like the logs, people/dog, grass, fire place?
One can fiddle forever
Would be nice to get a few more comments/suggestions - the trouble with so few active members . It does make posting something a rather fruitless exerciseLast edited by Alan; 30-03-2016, 05:34 PM.
- 1 like
Comment
-
As promised - I hope you don't mind. I used the freebie Lightroom opposition called LIGHTZONE.
Last edited by Isac; 31-03-2016, 09:21 PM.I Shoot A Canon
Web: isacimages.com / My Gear / Flickr Photostream
My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
- 1 like
Comment
-
On my monitor it looks OK but every monitor looks different. Here's the edit with Lightzone which is adjusted using the sliders - real easy to give a colour boost.
I Shoot A Canon
Web: isacimages.com / My Gear / Flickr Photostream
My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Comment
-
All Freeeee !!! You have to register before you download, but it's a super program - try it here.I Shoot A Canon
Web: isacimages.com / My Gear / Flickr Photostream
My memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my memory's not as sharp as it used to be.
- 1 like
Comment
Comment