White eye

[seaslug]

Bit soft and flat I know. I definately need a bit more practice on birds, but can hardly buy a comment on anything else, so if you can't beat em, join em!

[Phoenix]

How much are you willing to pay for my comment?
Like the composition, pretty bird on pretty flowers, but truthfully if this were my photo I would have deleted it and gone back and tried again.

[wigz]

It does look a bit soft, but I think the main problem is the difficult lighting with the bright background causing the bird to be a bit underexposed. On the positive side you've captured a good sized image of a quite small bird.

[seaslug]

How much are you willing to pay for my comment?
Like the composition, pretty bird on pretty flowers, but truthfully if this were my photo I would have deleted it and gone back and tried again.

It would not have been there.

[seaslug]

It does look a bit soft, but I think the main problem is the difficult lighting with the bright background causing the bird to be a bit underexposed. On the positive side you've captured a good sized image of a quite small bird.

Tiny and quick!

There were a few of them in my plum tree for a short while darting about like mad things. Unfortunately the tree was shaded in bright surrounds. There'll be other days!

[P Plates]

Like the composition but yep looks soft. Agree that the bird thread seems to be WAY more active than any of the others at present.

[Earthmother]

Considering the tiny birds are notoriously difficult to capture it's not a bad shot.

[Sully]

Comment: Over here we call them 'Silvereye' .... very hard to catch one